My Photo

Sponsor

Availability on NewsTex



  • This blog is now syndicated through Newstex's revolutionary "Blogs-on-Demand" product, which delivers premium full-text blog content to its web and media customers, including LexisNexis, CanWest, and EBSCO.

Availability on BlogBurst


  • BlogBurst.com

  • This blog is a member of BlogBurst, a syndication service that makes premium blog content available to major publishers like Reuters, Internet Broadcasting (WNBC, WMUR, etc.), USA Today, Fox News, The Washington Post, The Houston Chronicle, and many more. I am proud to announce that this blog made BlogBurst's leaderboard for the first quarter of 2007 (that means it ranked in the top 100 for the quarter, out of the more than 3500 member blogs -- with over 1,000,000 post headline displays and over 1000 full post views on Reuters alone). My spinoff blog, Political CommenTerry, is a member of the BlogBurst network as well. See the link below to Political CommenTerry, the ultimate authority on U.S. politics!
  • Political CommenTerry

BlogCritics Contributor


  • Blogcritics: news and reviews

July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Blog powered by TypePad

« An Alan Smithee Letter | Main | The NFL Needs a New Tie-Breaker »

July 29, 2006

The Counterproductive Estimated Tax Requirement

The requirement to pay estimated taxes on capital gains (along with its associated penalties for non-compliance) is counterproductive. It hurts both the taxpayer and the government and should be abolished.

Here's an illustration of what I mean. Let's say a man in the 35% tax bracket incurred a $1000 tax bill in the first quarter on an investment that earns him 20% a year. He could go ahead and send that money in to the IRS by the first quarter deadline to avoid a 5% penalty for the final three quarters of the year. This penalty would be $37.50 ($1000 x .05 x .75). Or he could go ahead and keep that money drawing the 20% for the last three quarters ($1000 x .20 x .75) for a total of $150. Of course, he would have to pay the $37.50 penalty when he files and the taxes on his additional $150 gains would be $52.50. That would still leave him with $60 ($150 - $37.50 - 52.50) that he wouldn't have had by just paying the estimated taxes. Even if there is a subsequent penalty on the $150 totaling $5.63 ($150 x .05 x .75), he would still be left with $54.37.

In the example above, many people would go ahead and send in the $1000 by the first quarter deadline in order to avoid the penalty. The rules encourage them to do this, but by doing so, they are cheating themselves and the government out of money. If the estimated tax requirement for capital gains were abolished, the man in my illustration would end up keeping an additional $97.50 ($150 - $52.50) and the government would get an additional $52 in tax revenue by letting him hold on to his money longer. In addition, the rules associated with estimated taxes are way too complicated and cause major inconveniences for taxpayers and IRS employees alike.

With all of that in mind, I so no reason why this requirement as it applies to capital gains should not be eliminated as soon as possible. Is the government so rich that can routinely turn away the extra funds? Does it just like to limit the earning ability of its citizens? Or does Congress just make a habit out of shooting itself in the foot? I think we all know the answer to that last question. Therefore, don't expect any changes to estimated tax rules any time soon.

Comments

Post a comment

Blog Summary


  • No-holds-barred commentary (and humor) by Terry Mitchell on a variety of subjects such as current events, society and culture, politics, personal finance, technology, religion, health and well-being, sports, media issues, and trivia.

    His blog entries have been picked up or linked to by mainstream news services like Reuters, CNN, Wall Street Journal Online, USA Today, the Houston Chronicle, the Austin American-Statesman, the Dallas Morning News, the Chicago Sun Times, the Palm Beach Post, CoxOhio.com, Northwest Florida Daily News, ConsumerAffairs.com, WWL-TV, WMUR, and WNBC. In addition to his blogging, he is currently a regular columnist for etalkinghead.com and American Chronicle. He has also written over 100 feature-length articles that have appeared on numerous Web sites.

    In this blog, Terry will never miss an opportunity to assail political correctness or take pot shots at the conventional foolishness.

    In this age of information overload, Terry knows that most people don't have time to read long, rambling blog entries. Therefore, he serves up most of his posts on this blog in small, bite-size portions. You'll appreciate his cut-to-the-chase writing style that gets straight to the point without the unnecessary and boring lead-ins.

    Also, Terry makes following promises in regard to this blog that very few bloggers will make:

    1) Posts which are always family-friendly and free of profanity and vulgarity (despite this fact, this blog is never boring and never shies away from controversy).

    2) A reasonable effort to assure proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and sentence structure.

    Readers are free to comment, both pro and con, on any post. However, any comments that include profanity or name-calling will be promptly deleted. One who cannot defend his position on a given issue without resorting to such tactics is, at best, too ignorant to adequately defend his position, and at worst, lacking a defensible position altogether.

    For Terry's biography (in his own words), see the "ABOUT" link on the left side of this page, just below his photo.

Search


  • Google
    Web This Blog

Ezine Articles Expert Author


  • EzineArticles.com/?expert=Terry__Mitchell Platinum Author